“Surely even now my witness is in Heaven, and my evidence is on high. My friends scorn me; my eyes pour out tears to God. Oh, that one might plead for a man with God, as a man pleads for his neighbor!” — Job 16:19-21
Miserable Comforters

Job’s reply to Eliphaz begins with grief sharpened into scorn: “I have heard many such things; miserable comforters are you all!” (v. 2). He’s not being petty—he’s being honest. His friends, who should have been a balm to his wounds, have instead made them fester. Their speeches were not comfort but condemnation. Their theology, which should have supported him, has instead collapsed on him like a weight.
“Shall words of wind have an end? Or what provokes you that you answer?” (v. 3). Job throws Eliphaz’s insult back at him. If Job’s cries were wind, then Eliphaz’s certainties are a storm—loud, damaging, and directionless. Job’s friends speak not to help but to protect their prosperity gospel. In doing so, they betray the most basic pastoral task: presence.
He adds: “I also could speak as you do, if your soul were in my soul’s place. I could heap up words against you and shake my head at you” (v. 4). Job is basically saying, “If our places were reversed, I could pile on too—but I would not.” Instead of wounding the wounded, Job says, “But I would strengthen you with my mouth, and the comfort of my lips would relieve your grief” (v. 5). Here is the aching irony: the sufferer has more compassion than the comfortable ones. This is the mark of a theologian of the cross—one who has been brought low yet still lifts others up.
Job exposes the futility of cold comfort. His friends have delivered theology without empathy, truth without mercy, and doctrine without love and wisdom. And because of this, their counsel is not just ineffective—it’s cruel. True comfort cannot come from those who refuse to sit in the ashes. Only those who’ve tasted grief can speak gently to it. Job’s response reveals real wisdom often arises not from the pulpit but from the ash heap.
This is not merely a technique of ancient counselors—it’s a diagnosis of pastoral ineptitude across generations. When the afflicted are rebuked instead of embraced—when their pain is silenced instead of heard—we repeat the sin of Job’s friends. The Church must learn from this: theology without compassion is not only futile, but also spiritually abusive. And those who speak for God must never forget that Christ, who comforts with His Holy Spirit, does not stand above the suffering—He enters into it.
God Has Torn Me

Job then turns his focus from human failure to divine affliction: “But now he has worn me out; You have made desolate all my company… He tears me in His wrath and hates me; He gnashes at me with His teeth” (vv. 7, 9). These are troubling words. Job speaks of God not as a refuge, but as an attacker. It’s not just that God has permitted his suffering—it’s that God feels like the one who’s tearing him asunder. He continues, “He breaks me with wound upon wound; He runs at me like a warrior” (v. 14). The imagery is violent and relentless. Job feels pursued, besieged, and broken by the very One he once trusted. He’s not merely being crushed—he’s being hunted.
And yet, even in this horror, Job does not turn away from God. He names God as the one behind his pain, but he still speaks to Him. This is the pattern we’ve been seeing with Job throughout the entire book so far—the paradox of faith in the fire, that Job believes God is responsible and yet he still believes God is the only one who can save him.
Hence this amazing turn: “Surely even now my witness is in Heaven, and my evidence is on high. My friends scorn me; my eyes pour out tears to God. Oh, that one might plead for a man with God, as a man pleads for his neighbor!” (vv. 19-21). Somehow, in the same breath with which he names God as his attacker, he confesses he has an advocate in Heaven. Job does not yet know the full picture, but his longing points beyond the ashes. This is not mere wishful thinking but a prophetic ache. Job longs for someone to take up his cause before the throne of God—someone who understands human pain yet stands blameless before God. Someone who can translate his suffering into intercession.
What Job cries out for, Christ fulfills. “Seeing then that we have a great High Priest who has passed through the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our confession. For we do not have a High Priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:14-15). I keep referring back to these verses in Hebrews. It is crucial to keep them at the center of Job’s suffering throughout the book.
Jesus, the Son of God, becomes Job’s answer. Jesus does not explain suffering—He enters it. In Jesus, we have the Advocate who not only pleads our case but bears our punishment. He is not merely a mediator between man and God—He is God who became man, that He might plead for man with blood, not just words.
The Ministry of Tears

Job’s phrase, “My eyes pour out tears to God” (v. 20) is a profound pastoral revelation. He has no arguments left. No eloquence. Only tears. But tears, when offered in faith, become intercession. Indeed, “Likewise the Spirit also helps in our weaknesses. For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought, but the Spirit Himself makes intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered” (Romans 8:26). Job’s lament is not a lack of trust—it’s the language of longing for Christ, and God does not despise it. Tears of grief is the ministry of the Holy Spirit.
The Church must never forget that some of the deepest theology happens through weeping. Any pastor will tell you that the Christians they’ve ministered to on their deathbeds exemplify the most astounding faith. Lament is not inferior to praise. Tears are not beneath prayer—they are prayer. In Job’s tears, we see the early shape of Gethsemane. Christ, too, would plead with loud cries and tears. And through His tears, He would redeem ours.
Job’s tears are a kind of liturgy—a broken liturgy of suffering that still dares to face God. In this, we glimpse the heart of Christian prayer: not polished language, but a posture of dependent trust. Job teaches us that even when our theology fails to hold our pain, our tears still speak rightly. They confess need, expose our humanity, and cry out for a God who will not remain silent forever.
Tears are not a contradiction to faith but the evidence of it. The Psalms are filled with such tears. David, for example, writes, “I am weary with my groaning; all night I make my bed swim; I drench my couch with my tears. My eye wastes away because of grief; it grows old because of all my enemies” (Psalm 6:6-7). And yet, he still trusts God in his lament, “Depart from me, all you workers of iniquity; for the LORD has heard the voice of my weeping. The LORD has heard my supplication; the LORD will receive my prayer” (vv. 8-9).
To cry before God is to believe He listens. To grieve in His direction is to confess He still reigns. In Job’s lament, the veil of Heaven has not yet lifted, but he continues to press his face against it, wet with sorrow, trusting that somewhere beyond the veil is a God who sees, who hears, and who will one day answer with mercy.
The Intercessor Foreshadowed
Chapter 16 reveals a man who’s been misunderstood on Earth but is beginning to glimpse the possibility of being understood and sympathized with in Heaven. He still feels abandoned, but he senses—just barely—that Someone, somewhere, may yet speak on his behalf. His friends have become his accusers—Satan’s assisting prosecuting attorneys. His God seems to have become his adversary. And yet, he believes—against all odds—that an advocate remains.
In Job’s cry for a witness, we hear the distant echo of the Gospel. He does not yet see the cross, but he’s pointing toward it. He does not yet name Christ, but he’s longing for Him. The theology of the cross is taking shape—not through tidy doctrines but through tears. And in the tears of Job, the Church sees her own reflection: afflicted, confused, but not forsaken.

1 thought on “Job 16: The Tears of the Intercessor”