“If your sons have sinned against Him, He has cast them away for their transgression.” — Job 8:4
When Friends Speak Cruelty in the Name of Truth
After Job’s lament in chapters 6 and 7, Bildad the Shuhite steps forward. His tone is colder than Eliphaz’s. Whereas Eliphaz opened with hesitant diplomacy, Bildad charges in with the full force of his theology of glory. He’s offended not only by Job’s words but also by the very idea that Job could be innocent yet still stuffer. Bildad’s speech is a pure expression of retributive justice. He is the embodiment of a theology that demands symmetry: righteousness brings reward, wickedness brings ruin—no ifs, ands, or buts. Any deviation from this pattern is considered an error in perception, not in the theological framework.
In verse 3, he asks rhetorically, “Does God subvert judgement? Or does the Almighty pervert justice?” The expected answer is no. And from this truth, Bildad draws a terrible conclusion: Since God is just, and since Job suffers, then Job (and/or his family) must be guilty.
Then comes one of the most heartless sentences in all of Scripture: “If your sons have sinned against Him, He has cast them away from their transgression” (v. 4). Bildad is referring to the death of Job’s ten children—crushed under the collapse of a great house (1:18-19). He interprets this tragedy not as part of a mysterious divine plan or even the corruption of an unjust, sinful world, but as divine execution. For Bildad, the death of his children is proof of their guilt.
This is theology untampered by mercy. It is justice without compassion and doctrine without love.
The Logic of Retribution
Bildad urges Job to seek God and repent, promising that if Job is truly pure and upright, “Surely now He would awake for you, and prosper your rightful dwelling place” (v. 6). The implication is clear: restoration is available, but only if Job admits his guilt. This logic reinforces the assumption that God only afflicts the wicked and that repentance immediately restores blessing.
Bildad appeals to tradition to support his claim: “For inquire, please, of the former age, and consider the things discovered by their fathers” (v. 8). He presents his argument as the accumulated wisdom of the past. In effect, he’s saying, “This is how it’s always been. The righteous prosper, and the wicked fall. You do the math.”
He then launches into a series of metaphors. The hypocrite is like a papyrus that withers without water, or a spider’s web that cannot hold weight, or a vine that is uprooted and forgotten (vv. 11-19). These images are evocative, but they all serve the same purpose: to portray Job as a man who appeared strong but has now been exposed for his iniquity.
Much of what Bildad says contains elements of truth. God is just. The wicked do often perish. Repentance is good. Tradition has value. But Bildad’s error lies in his application. As a true theologian of glory, he speaks as though he understands the full counsel of God. Just like Eliphaz before him, he has no room in his theology for innocent suffering. He cannot imagine Job’s condition could be undeserved. Therefore, he weaponizes theology and turns it into accusation, which is the work of Satan the Accuser himself. Bildad demands repentance from a man who is already blameless.
This is not unlike those in the Church today who utilize Scripture as a diagnostic tool, assuming every hardship is a symptom of hidden sin, which, as has already been said, is indicative of today’s prosperity gospel. True pastoral care discerns not only truth but timing. It distinguishes between the Law’s exposure and the Gospel’s healing. Bildad knows the Law, but he misapplies it and does not offer the antidote Job needs—the Gospel. He preaches repentance without mercy and correction without comfort.
As a theologian of glory, Bildad looks at Job’s condition and presumes to know its cause. He demands moral clarity where God has revealed none. He cannot sit in mystery or accept God might be doing something deeper than retribution.
Bildad offers a false gospel of self-effort and conditional reward. “Behold, God will not cast away the blameless, nor will He uphold the evildoers” (v. 20). Again, this statement is theologically sound when viewed through the lens of eternal judgement, but when applied to Job’s present suffering, it becomes not just a lie, but also cruel. For Bildad, God’s favor can be discerned by one’s circumstances. If you’re prosperous, you must be righteous and have God’s favor.
This is the prosperity gospel in seed form, and it has not vanished from the Church. Many still believe God’s love is evident in material blessing and His displeasure in affliction. But the cross shatters this view. Christ, the truly Righteous One, suffered more than any, having become sin for us (2 Corinthians 5:21). Yet the Father’s love was not absent in Gethsemane or Golgotha; it dripped in the blood of His sweat and was fully displayed on the cross for the whole world to see.
Job, like Christ, suffers while innocent. Bildad cannot accept this possibility. Indeed, the cross would have been a stumbling block to all three friends (1 Corinthians 1:23). Therefore, although his words sound orthodox, they are spiritually destructive.
Pastoral Implications
Bildad’s speech is a cautionary tale for pastors and caregivers. When we comfort the grieving, we must avoid the urge to interpret their suffering. We are not called to explain why affliction has come but to proclaim Christ in the midst of it, even help them bear their cross, just as Simon of Cyrene did for Jesus.
The theology of glory cannot sustain the soul in crisis. It demands the sufferer fix themselves in order to receive mercy. But the theology of the cross proclaims Christ joins the sufferer in their brokenness. We do not climb our way out of affliction to reach God. Rather, God descends into our affliction to reach us.
Pastoral care shaped by Bildad’s logic may sound pious but will deepen despair. Job needed someone to bear his grief, not analyze it with the microscope of self-proclaimed sagacity. He needed someone to speak of God’s promises, not argue God’s justice.
Bildad’s speech is an echo chamber of tradition and systematized retribution. It may have logic, but it has no love. It may have structure, but it lacks compassion. And while it claims to defend God’s justice, it distorts God’s mercy. Hence St. Paul’s own warning, “Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing” (1 Corinthians 13:1-2).
True theology speaks to the sufferer not with conditional comfort but with unconditional presence. In the end, Job will be vindicated—not because he figured it out, but because God remained faithful. And Bildad’s words will be judged not simply for their content, but for their cruelty.
The Lutheran Column 